“These are volatile times, Your Highness. The American Revolution lost your father the Colonies, the French Revolution murdered brave King Louis, and there are tremendous rumblings in Prussia, although that might have something to do with the sausages.” – Black Adder the Third
What was Bismarck’s favorite Queen song? Under Prussia.
The world that most of us grew up in was far different from the world that we’re seeing today. Among the biggest differences is that the United States was unequivocally the strongest economic power in the world. Couple it with the “Western” bloc of non-Soviet Europe and Japan, it was amazingly dominant. The United States even stood next to smaller nations at the urinal, right next to them even though there were other urinals open, just to show that dominance.
When people today talk about cultural appropriation, they seem to forget that it’s largely American and British Commonwealth culture that was appropriated throughout the world. Blue jeans? Not invented nor popularized by Commiebloc nations, nope. Nor rock and roll.
In that Western world, there was actually a stunning lack of diversity. Want rock and roll? Sure you could listen to the Scorpions® from Germany, AC/DC™ from Australia, Iron Maiden© from Bongland, or Dio™ from the United States, but it was all the same root. The western world was a very homogeneous place, filled with trust due in large part to that shared sense of purpose and values.
A Catholic friend gave up cleaning the dryer filter. For Lent.
The level of trust probably peaked in around 1965 in the United States. In 1965, 77% of people felt that most people in the country were trustworthy, and now it’s down to 58%. We lived (well, those who were alive in 1965) in a high trust society that rivals the top levels of trust in the world today, sort of like Denmark but without all the smørrebrød, bicycles, and yurp-de-yur sounds.
The thing about a high trust society is that transactions are easy when we have trust in one another. If you show up to buy a 1884 Iron Chancellor Bismarck® PEZ™ dispenser that I’ve got for sale, well, you trust me that I own the PEZ® dispenser, that it’s real, and I trust you that the check you just gave me will clear or the cash you just gave me isn’t stolen.
And if the check doesn’t clear, you trust the local cops will solve the problem for you. They’re not corrupt, or if they are, they’re not so corrupt as to ignore crimes, especially when they involve the Franco-Prussian War Limited Series PEZ® dispenser set. A belief that crime is low and corruption is low is the key to creating the social trust to make a high trust society.
In a high trust world, this works well.
Is a sketchy Italian neighborhood called a spaghetto?
A high trust world, though, is not an anonymous world. Conmen from Nigeria and India use the anonymity of the Internet to create situations where they can create the relationship required, the “confidence” that is the “con” in conman. They then prey on people based on the residual trust from their high trust past. There is a reason that the elderly are primary targets – they remember an America where predation was not the norm.
Right now, oddly, one of the highest trust cultures in the world (according to the Integrated Values Surveys, 2022) is China. There are certainly several reasons for this. First, the government will kill bankers for fraud. Second, they’re almost all actually Chinese, which makes them a nation, not a country. They (mainly) share the same culture, values, genes, and language. That goes a long way – blood is thicker than water is a cliché that exists for a reason.
Generally, the higher the trust in a society, the greater the level of GDP per capita. Denmark has the highest trust on the world, and is fourth in world GDP per capita. It’s not perfectly correlated, though, the Chinese are high trust, they are low income. But compare with India, which is close to the worst country, with a trust level of 17% and an annual GDP per capita of a used 2000 Nissan® Xterra© with a broken air conditioner.
I hear that Biden has just signed an order to combat global warming on his way out. He sent three battalions of Marines to invade the Sun.
It doesn’t take much, though to turn a high trust world into a low trust world. Basics like faith that elections are fair, and that only valid votes are counted go a long way toward maintaining stability. You’d think that would be easy in 2024, but it’s not, since at least a third of the electorate wants any vote cast to be counted, rather than just valid ones. But a conflict of visions like that lowers trust in our basic systems.
Additionally, trust that criminal prosecution will be fair and unbiased has to be held very highly, otherwise gangs of people seeking a justice that the courts didn’t give them will replace the system. I’m thinking the political prosecution of the January 6 protesters is a horrible indicator.
In turn, this will lower the amount of wealth that can be created in society. Trust is a form of wealth, but it’s also (mostly) a precondition for a country getting wealthy.
When I was born, I had four kidneys. But as I grew up, two turned into adult knees.
But trust in society isn’t the same at every single place in society: in Modern Mayberry, trust is pretty high.
Crimes are rarer here in Modern Mayberry, especially major crimes. Mainly, we all know each other, and so except for drifters and tweakers, people are (mostly) honest. People even drive more politely and more forgivingly in small towns because, if you’re a tool, sooner or later everyone will know. Oh, and we have guns and constitutional carry and crime rates are much lower in places where people aren’t walking victims. And the local prosecutor won’t charge a store owner with shooting a robber if the robber was armed.
Here in Modern Mayberry, it is still pretty high trust. My kid drops off our car to get fixed and picks it up when the tire’s been replaced even before I pay. The guy knows I’m good for it – I’ve been going to his business for over a decade. Commerce is easy here, and so are most transactions.
Part of that, I think, is that the world here is still mainly local. We don’t have a big-name chain bank, instead we have a few local banks run by local people that already know the families that live here. For a farmer getting a loan, it’s much more about reputation than credit score, and a banker giving a loan that might wreck a borrower . . . won’t wreck the borrower.
There’s a moral implication when we work together as a community, a moral implication. Huges systems are efficient, but the rob us of something
As we become more atomized and less homogeneous, trust is replaced by systems and barriers. Our relatively homogeneous culture is replaced by a disingenuous god of diversity, where the beliefs of every culture but our own are celebrated.
Not all jokes about agriculture are corny.
A low trust culture is part of the definition of those “bad times that are brought about by weak men”. And we have seen countries around the world be low trust for millennia. That, though, has never been the fate of the West, at least not for long.
As I have long said, none of this will be easy. But there is one problem – in a low trust society, how can I be sure my Limited Edition® Franco-Prussian War Commemorative Series™ PEZ© dispensers will be authentic?
It’s easy to maintain trust in a community based on real wealth: natural resources. When the farmer has fertile soil and a good chance of cooperative weather, the banker knows that the farmer will bring in a crop and pay back the loan. When there are fish in the sea, the fisherman can pay back the loan for a new freezer for the fish. When there’s copper in the mine, the mine owner can pay a fair wage and still make a profit. When there’s oil just waiting to gush up out of the ground, drilling a well is a good gamble. But when the resources are depleted, the population turns against itself for individual survival and trust evaporates. Expanding the population through unlimited immigration, while resources are being depleted, is a plan for disaster.
The doctor has a technical term for unlimited growth: cancer.
Lathechuck
The wife has been watching old reruns of Survivor. I never cared for the show because it rewards sociopathic behavior but it has me pondering a thought experiment……
Let’s say you pulled 50 people at random and put them on an island and did a Gilligan’s Island show in real life. There is no outside help but the island does provide some basic resources (e.g. fish, coconuts but as the song goes….not a single luxury). If you checked back in a year, what is the likelihood that the group would have developed a semi-functioning society? What is the likelihood of total collapse and/or starvation?
If you wanted to guarantee the society thrives, what are the minimum skillsets and/or characteristics that you think would be needed? Is survival predicated more on intelligence (e.g. a minimum average IQ)? A high social trust factor? Or will it depend more on just having people with the right skillsets in the group (e.g. survival skills, carpentry, etc.)
I’ve been using this thought experiment to try and understand why some countries always seem to fail economically, whereas some always succeed. I agree the social trust part is a big factor in the success, but not sure if it is the only factor. My current view is that all of the variables are important but are also highly confounded with each other. For example intelligence and key skills are important, but those folks won’t accomplish much if the rest of the tribe is screwing them over due to lack of trust.
D
This happened (albeit on a smaller scale) in 1965 when 6 boys between 13 and 16 years of age were shipwrecked on a deserted island. When they were rescued approximately a year and a half later, the boys were found to have “set up a small commune with food garden, hollowed-out tree trunks to store rainwater, a gymnasium with curious weights, a badminton court, chicken pens and a permanent fire, all from handiwork, an old knife blade and much determination.” (See https://www.theguardian.com/books/2020/may/09/the-real-lord-of-the-flies-what-happened-when-six-boys-were-shipwrecked-for-15-months)
Start by not buying it on ebay.
IMHO to return to trust in our country would require public executions.
“Huges systems are efficient, but the rob us of something”
Up to a point. Then they are just more competitive because they can steamroll smaller systems, whether it’s a more efficient but smaller nation or a commercial competitor. e.g., Walzmart lobbying (bribing) politicians to get favorable rates and being able to run a local store at a deficit indefinitely until all the mom n’ pop stores go out of business. At some point though the efficiency loss is so great that the system can’t continue.
This is pretty much what the book “The Collapse of Complex Societies” by Joseph Tainter is about. Efficiency increases due to economies of scale and increased specialization (amongst other things) up to a point, then efficiency decreases. I think a lot of the inefficiency is really the elites monopolizing wealth to the point that it strangles the producing part of the economy, but that doesn’t invalidate the theory. The bigger a system gets, the easier it is for those at the top to obfuscate their shenanigans.
Tainter video on his book:
Gee what might have happened in 1965 that led to a loss of social cohesion? Maybe something about opening the floodgates for the detritus of the world to come crash on our couch and demand that we turn America into the sort of craphole that they fled from in the first place?
Trust is a blindingly White notion. I defy anyone to point to a majority-black or brown country/city/neighborhood/household anywhere in the world where one can leave property unguarded with any expectation of it still being there in the morning. Demographics is destiny, and this formerly high-trust society is destined to fail, now that Pandora’s box has been split wide open.
You mean, perhaps, this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965
How it started: “The law abolished the National Origins Formula, which had been the basis of U.S. immigration policy since the 1920s…The National Origins Formula had been established in the 1920s to preserve American homogeneity by promoting immigration from Western and Northern Europe. During the 1960s, at the height of the civil rights movement, this approach increasingly came under attack for being racially discriminatory…. Prior to the Act, the U.S. was 85% White, with Black people (most of whom were descendants of slaves) making up 11%, while Latinos made up less than 4%. The act also set a numerical limit on immigration (120,000 per annum) from the Western Hemisphere for the first time in U.S. history.”
How it’s going: Latinos now make up 20% of the US population, illegal immigration into the US topped 800,000 in 2023, and the total number of illegal immigrants to the US stands at 11.7 million.
https://cmsny.org/us-undocumented-population-increased-in-july-2023-warren-090624/
Trump’s favorite chart:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=https://arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/YLJSWNCPLVAEZESEKG3QRT5JTI.png&w=1200
The government and the Left (but I repeat myself) have been tossing around that “only 11 million Illegals” BS for 30 years.
In 2023, over 4 million Illegals entered the country. Biden flew in over half a million.
That is exactly correct. It was 11 million when I was in college and at least 10.8 million entered just during the Biden administration based on numbers from the Border Patrol. The real number has to be closer to 30 million. That is almost 10% of the official number of people living in America.
Another 1965 factor was the elimination of silver in coinage & Silver Certificates.
Somewhat off topic: if there’s a B&B livestream tonight, I’ll be AWOL for a shameful second week in a row. For a retired guy, I’m sure getting my butt kicked by my calendar. Next week should be better.
Not exactly the same, but I did a video on a similar topic a while back.
The problem of pain and the seventh commandment
https://youtu.be/R4yA2oR6lGw