The Cold War . . . A Victory?

“My name is Drago. I’m a fighter from the Soviet Union. I fight all my life and I never lose. soon I fight Rocky Balboa, and the world will see his defeat. Soon, the whole world will know my name.” – Rocky IV

sovietcat

Result of Soviet experiment to mix Lenin with a cat.

It was an autumn night.  I was driving back to college after a weekend visit home.  My car sped uphill as fast as it could – my foot pushed the gas pedal until it was flush with the floor and all 1800cc’s of General Motors® engine that I owned was working at peak capacity.  The steep grade kept my car from going much over 70 mph, but that was breaking the law all the same.  Thankfully, there was no place for a cop to hide, and if one did by chance catch my speed on the radar, he’d be more likely to congratulate me on being able to go that fast up the hill than give me a ticket.

The trees slid by, growing straight up even though the slope they grew on was steeply slanted.  I looked up at the starry sky through the driver’s side window.  The stars were everywhere.  The cold, dry mountain air and utter lack of light pollution and haze made the night sky here confusing – how can you see a constellation when the sky is so filled with stars that no pattern can be found?  The mountain pass also took me into a radio dead zone – not a single channel, AM or FM was available.

On a Sunday night, there was no other traffic.  My headlights were the only lights within twenty miles – not even a lonely mountain cabin.  And that’s when I noticed the glow from the north.  A deep red glow, one like I’d never seen before spanned the entire northern horizon.

fidget

“Did they finally blow it all up?”  I quickly hit the radio button to scan stations.  The orange LED numbers sped endlessly by without finding a channel to fix on.  I switched to AM.  Again, spinning numbers, repeating back at the beginning.  No signals.  I pulled over at a wide spot in the road meant for truckers to put chains on when the pass was snow packed and icy.  I got out and closed the door behind me.

The night was still, the only sound the pinging of contracting metal as the engine cooled.  And the only light, outside of the stars, was that red glow from the north.  I knew a major military installation was on the other side of that hill, maybe 75 miles to the north.  One that would certainly be on the list for missiles coming over the pole if the Russians decided that it was time to play.  Was this what a nuclear glow looked like?

For the next fifteen minutes I drove on, the radio searching in vain for a station.  As quickly as I left the pass, the radio hit and grabbed a station.  Nothing strange, nothing unusual – “the hits keep coming!”   I breathed a sigh of relief and settled on the rock station.  AC/DC©.  Thunderstruck.  That would work.  The lights of the next town appeared as I followed the road.  The next morning I read in the paper – “Northern Lights Visible Over Half the United States.”

raindance

Maybe one day communism will work . . . though rain dances have a better record.

Looking back, there is a tendency to think the Cold War was a farce, a fake war that the United States was destined to win since we were fighting against a bunch of fat vodka-swilling goofs in fur hats.  That wasn’t what we felt at the time, as it seemed that the Soviets went from victory to victory, and communism kept spreading.  We knew that we were caught up in a clash between economic systems, one that could change from taking turns feeding rifles and grenades to various flavors of rebels in countries that no one really cared about to full mobilization and launch of nuclear weapons faster than the Dominos® thirty minute delivery guarantee.

In addition to being a clash of ideology, the Cold War was also a clash of economic systems.  Freedom was given a chance, not because of its efficiency and all of the awesome blue jeans, but because the war planners thought it would produce more.  Even as free markets “wasted” money on consumer pursuits, they also gave people incentives to create more.  The economy of the United States was an open book, and it was mainly flourishing, having survived both double digit interest rates and Barry Manilow.

pros

The Soviet Union, however, didn’t share information with the world on its economy, except good news about Soviet technical triumphs.  From the outside, the Soviet Union looked strong – exceptional world athletes at the Olympics, technical triumphs like the first satellite and the first man in orbit made the Soviets seem a technical machine that would destroy the West.  There was the idea that the Soviets were ahead of us, technically, even though the first pocket calculator they produced was based on a Texas Instruments® calculator that they bought, gutted, and presented as their own.

Their fighter jets were, however, real.  And very good.  If their missiles weren’t accurate, they had thousands of them.

But what we didn’t see from the West was, despite the technical achievements and strong military, the Soviet Union was rotting inside.  What caused the rot?  You could argue corruption, you could argue a lot of things, but when it comes down to the true root cause, it’s simple.  The Soviet system did not encourage individuals to greatness.  It relied on central planning – the equivalent of having Congress describe what the economy should make, down to the smallest details.  The Soviet Union collapsed.  Slowly.  Unlike the economies of the West, it couldn’t grow fast enough to fund a response to the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), more commonly known as Star Wars.

And that was it.  SDI was one more thing than the Soviets could cope with.  The Soviet system collapsed like systems do – first at the edges in Eastern Europe, then finally at the core in Moscow.  This slow collapse played out over more than a decade, and only really started with the Berlin wall coming down.

The biggest part of the Soviet Union ending was the most likely threat of the world ending all at once.  With that ending, the West was cut adrift – it ceased to have an opponent in any real fashion.  Without its opponent, in Solzhenitsyn’s speech to Harvard® (LINK), what the West really lost became evident.   There’s a lot to this speech, more than one post or even two or three.  I’ll probably revisit it again in time.

“. . . in early democracies, as in the American democracy at the time of its birth, all individual human rights were granted because man is God’s creature.  That is, freedom was given to the individual conditionally, in the assumption of his constant religious responsibility.  Such was the heritage of the preceding thousand years.  Two hundred or even fifty years ago, it would have seemed quite impossible, in America, that an individual could be granted boundless freedom simply for the satisfaction of his instincts or whims.  Subsequently, however, all such limitations were discarded everywhere in the West; a total liberation occurred from the moral heritage of Christian centuries with their great reserves of mercy and sacrifice.”

In our struggle with and defeat of our Soviet enemy we’ve lost two things.  We’ve lost who we are as a people.  A generation ago it was clear to every American that your mere presence in America didn’t make you an American – much more was required.  Now our division multiplies and it becomes apparent how “satisfaction of instincts or whims” has shattered us.

sovietcomp

We’ve also lost any sense of purpose, a national goal worth achieving.  It’s not that there’s not a lot to be done – there are plenty of goals left that are worthy of humanity to accomplish:  interplanetary flight, immortality, understanding physics.  But right now we can’t agree on anything.

In the end, if we can’t solve this, we’ll fragment.  Thankfully, that will give us a whole new batch of enemies . . . .

Author: John

Nobel-Prize Winning, MacArthur Genius Grant Near Recipient writing to you regularly about Fitness, Wealth, and Wisdom - How to be happy and how to be healthy. Oh, and rich.

12 thoughts on “The Cold War . . . A Victory?”

    1. Exactly! Pournelle, especially did an a great job with SDI. Wish I would have had a chance to meet him, but at least we have his books. And Chaos Manor. Plus they made science fiction fun.

  1. John – – Excellent distillation of history into an essence that Millineals and other history-ignorants can appreciate and perhaps swallow as truths. This is a KEEPER; one of your best !!

    The cultural wars that we suffer and which are becoming wedges in the fracturing of this Nation accelerated as we lowered our defenses against “communism” as the “evil empire”that it was/is….

    1. Thanks so much for the kind words! This one had me (actually) questioning myself – it was a different tact than the last few. I held my breath and hit publish. Thanks again!

  2. We lost the ideology war generations ago. We lost because our enemies conquered the heights first, then laid siege from that great advantage. By the time most people noticed the problem, it was already too late to end this peacefully.

    Every year that has gone by mare it that much harder for us to win. The only light on the horizon now is Generation Zyklon. They know they live in a war zone, and are preparing for the coming unpleasantness.

    1. Perhaps because there was only one side presented, plus a, “yes, but not as fast” side. Academia is a wasteland, wanting diversity in all things but ideas.

      Gen Z is interesting. Next week (Monday) I’ve got a very interesting example of their thought processes.

  3. Russia lost for the same reason that Britain’s ( pre-1914 ) enemies lost. The empire with a central bank is able to more efficiently fund conquest. In Britain’s case, she had the most efficient central bank compared to the others. Russia had none, which was the whole point of the Revolution. Not because communism is so great but because central banks require a surrender of nationalism. And Russia doesn’t play nice with invaders. Russia has a history of fighting for its independence and the US has a history of worshiping Mammon. So why would we have had a problem selling out to a central bank? It gave us empire, just not for as long as we would have liked. And as soon as we “won” over Russia, past the first few years of the Peace Dividend, we sealed our fate economically ( 1971 our fate was sealed energy/resource wise ). Without a war to fight, our economy cannot function. That was the whole point of the Cold War. The War On Terror didn’t work, as it did nothing to mobilize the economy on to a war footing. We didn’t outspend the Soviets, as much as we were spending enough to keep our own military growing ( without spending too much on the bankers ). The War On Drugs is just funding the Deep State. The War On Terror is mostly a continuation of the drug war, although it is burning through inventory we aren’t replacing. Only the Cold War was sufficient economically. Many other factors, of course. Empire is not JUST economic. But good enough for a broad outline. The end is always the same, growing population meets shrinking resources, but the journey can always be different.

    1. Wonderful analysis, as usual (seriously this one is excellent). I am sad, however, at the deficiency of FLIR scopes (not seriously).

  4. It really is difficult to explain to the younger folk how different things are. I know everyone says that but it is absolutely the case now. Absent the unifying culture and institutions that most of us grew up with, there is nothing uniting large swaths of the nation with the rest of the nation. We don’t have anything in common, we can’t stand each other and we don’t even agree on what it means to be American or who gets to be American. Without the Red Threat there isn’t really anything that we can agree on. When the economic system is flush with currency thanks to manipulation and easy credit, it is easier to keep the sides apart but soon, very soon, we won’t be able to keep all of the plates spinning and some groups are going to get the short end of the stick.

    1. I think one amplifier is media fragmentation. Yes, we get more of the actual truth (which is good, I think) but we aren’t reading the same things, watching the same things, or even seeing the same truth.

      It’s like one group is in a Barry Manilow concert and the other is in a Neil Diamond concert. Is it Mandy or Cracklin’ Rosie??

      1. Barrie Manilow vs/ Snoop Dogg vs/ Barbara Streisand vs/ Garth Brooks vs/ Axl Rose vs/ Kurt Cobain.

Comments are closed.