The Wealth Pump In America – Two Examples

“We wounded this place, it’s our duty to close her wounds, it’s the least we can do to show our gratitude for all the wealth she’s given us.” – Treasure of the Sierra Madres

Time is wealth – I found out that a fresher kidney costs more than one that’s a week old.  Also, never try to donate more than three at a time – they ask a lot of questions.

I read this week that the UN Climate summit (LINK) is offering food that included smoke wagyu burgers, Philly cheesesteaks, and BBQ at the summit.  This same summit is expected to tell people that they can’t have meat anymore because, you know, climate.  It’s almost like there’s a double standard . . .

The nice thing about spending the time reading books like Turchin’s End Times is that it gives a new filter to view the events that we’re seeing around us.  This filter, or model, is useful because it allows the events of the world to be reviewed in relation to the model.

Peter Turchin’s End Times: There Be Dragons Here

Turchin actually presented two major models:  Elite Overproduction, and The Wealth Pump.  While both are important to a civilization beginning to dissolve, the one I’d like to focus on today is The Wealth Pump.  Part of the wonderful part of a model, is that it can predict what’s going to happen, and explain the otherwise unexplainable.

Never get married on Mt. Everest – it’s all downhill from there.

Let’s take a look at the first strategy:  feminism.  This came on board starting as far back as the 1800s.  Why?  It was good business.  More women making financial decisions meant more customers.  To this day, that’s the case – women make more purchasing decisions than men.

Mission accomplished.

The next idea was to mobilize women into the workforce.  It took two world wars where women went from making babies to making welds on Liberty Ships to test the theory.  In the 1950s, though, those darn women went back to homes, and were making babies in the biggest baby making event the world ever saw.

That wasn’t good for business, and, thus feminism.

Chuck Norris had COVID.  For breakfast.

Feminism has had a long, horrible past.  In modern-ish times, the biggest example was the Spanish Civil War.  The first things the commies did was make abortion legal and to abolish marriage.  Oh, sure, they killed a lot of priests and nuns, but the focus was on splitting apart the family.

Why?

So women could be more productive in the economy.  This is the weird place where The Wealth Pump and commies are in complete agreement:  women shouldn’t be at home making babies, women should be at work making PowerPoints® and tractors in Glorious Tractor Collective Number 171.  Women aren’t loving members of a family, who have the job of creating compassion in their families while the men instill duty and honor.

Nope.  There are decades of propaganda convincing women that being a mother just wasn’t enough – it was beneath them.  The latchkey generation (mine) was based on the thought that Moms should do whatever and find themselves because . . . reasons.  Although my parents didn’t divorce, millions of other families were ripped apart by that abomination.

When stoners divorce, do they get joint custody?

Yes.  Divorce is bad.  Sometimes it is justified, and that requires fault.  But no-fault divorce made it a game show based around fun and prizes for women – they still initiate 80-90% of divorces.  Combined with the government welfare for women using a uterus as a clown car, this creates a society of children who have no real family.  Also?  They have no real sense of duty or honor.

But, hey, we have tons of women who are making wonderful PowerPoints® on how to exclude white guys from jobs without looking like they’re excluding white guys from jobs.  And those women weren’t making babies.  Certainly, The Wealth Pump requires cheap labor, so that brings us to:

Immigration.

The hordes of immigrants that have been coming to this country, both legal and illegal have been in unprecedented numbers.  The American public overwhelmingly is done with this level of immigration – they don’t want it.  Why was Trump’s three-word slogan – “Build the wall” so effective?

Because people want a damn wall.  In many places, they look around at their country and see it doesn’t resemble at all the country they were born in, and they’re tired of it.

The wall might work.  China built one, and they have nearly zero illegal immigrants.

Yet, it continues.  The Democrats crave it like a junkie craves whatever junkies crave after heroin.  I think they crave drooling, which would explain why they like Joe Biden.

The Republicans have and continue to be the “sure, but not so much” party since, well, forever.  Reagan signed in the first big amnesty in the 1980s.  Why?  Because the wealthy folks demanded it.

Why?

Because all the women were making PowerPoints® doing whatever it was that women did in business in the 1980s, The Wealth Pump demanded this:  cheap labor.  Women had been cheap labor, since they could run typewriters while the men did the real stuff.  But when women wanted to move up the corporate ladder and computers allowed people other than women born with the typing-gene to type, The Wealth Pump demanded that we have cheaper labor.

Thus?

Rather than pay a slightly higher wage to people picking strawberries, it was way easier to have illegal people pick lettuce and tomatoes and strawberries.  They couldn’t complain, or they’d get booted out of the country.  Rather than pay actual Americans to pick (or invent picking machines) it’s much easier to have a labor class in this country with no ties to this country and work for less.

Gardening is complicated – someone suggested I try manure on my strawberries, but, ugh, I’m sticking with whipped cream.

Except these Wealth Pump-encouraged people also get free health care for their children, free schooling for their children, and career paths that receive priority over the people born here.  When you add it all up, these actually end up sucking much more money out of the system than they provide in economic benefits to the country.  This analysis doesn’t even come close to adding in the societal costs in lower trust and increased crime.

Here we have the ultimate irony of The Wealth Pump – it creates more wealth for the operators, while it sucks the money out of the entire country.

But, hey, Bezos has a new tramp with lips so inflated that he could use her to transport Amazon™ packages if he inflated them with helium and a yacht that can land his helicopter.  And eat all the beef he wants, even though it’s time for you to get in the pod and eat the bugs.

I mean, it’s your duty to those that benefit from The Wealth Pump.

Author: John

Nobel-Prize Winning, MacArthur Genius Grant Near Recipient writing to you regularly about Fitness, Wealth, and Wisdom - How to be happy and how to be healthy. Oh, and rich.

23 thoughts on “The Wealth Pump In America – Two Examples”

  1. Yup. That’s about it.

    The strategy never changes, not from the first folks dropped on this big ole sad rock.

    Split up the male and the female, empower the female over the male because Oppression and voila! you have nations simple to control. Males disempowered, families destroyed, cultures in chaos. Easy money, and tender is the veal.

    1. Warrior societies don’t have exactly that issue, but in the end, they lose stability as well. The Wealth Pump didn’t start with us, but hopefully we end it.

    1. … and the 13th, 14th, 15th — unconstitutional due to “Reconstruction” altering of state governments
      … 16th, 17th, — unconstitutional on their face [18th also, already repealed]
      … 19th — arguable and probably impossible, but reasonable on the basis of effect
      … 22nd — arguable but unnecessary in a true constitutional non-17th amendment republic
      … 23rd — arguable but judged reasonable by history (see also Puerto Rico)

      I leave the 26th and 27th for a sidebar discussion.

  2. Of the 10-20% of divorces that are initiated by men, a certain number are due to the fact the woman is failing to be a good wife and take care of her husband.

    1. Eh. That one cuts both ways, i.e. that the man’s failing to be a good husband and to take care of his wife.

      That’s fault. And while it can get loosey-goosey (consider your first reaction to my switching of the sexes), it is still better than what we have now.

      Though “at fault” heavily favors the wealthy in shenanigans as well. TANSTAAFL. As Mrs. Hoyt’s grandmacused to say “a law in every heart, or a policeman on every corner… And who pays the coppers?

      Why it is almost as if no legal system or custom can work outside of a virtuous society. 🤔

  3. As it goes with lipstick on a pig…it’s just the same crisis but dressed up differently.

  4. I’m not sure I buy the “Elite Production” thing, as the “elites” being produced aren’t actually elite. Part of the definition of elite is having influence or power of some kind, not just the attitude that the world owes you. It doesn’t matter how many PhDs in social sciences a barista has, they simply aren’t elites. In the middle ages, 3rd sons might not have land, but they had weapons and knew how to use them. Which is why popes and kings at peace were often looking for far-off wars (e.g., Crusades) to send the excess off to. But no one gives a shit about over-educated baristas and pizza delivery drivers. They are useless eaters, as Yuval Harari would call them.

    The “Wealth Pump” idea is spot on though. It seems like a different way of looking at Tainter’s theory on societal collapse in “The Collapse of Complex Societies.”

    1. The USA produces more lawyers every year than the rest of the world combined. I’ve lived long enough to see the obvious results.

    2. It’s a function of how many are in the class that are competing for the top spots, like when we had multiple billionaires running for president (Trump, Bloomberg).

Comments are closed.