âIt doesn’t matter who we are, what matters is our plan.â â The Dark Knight Rises
Whatâs the difference between protestors in Hong Kong and Minneapolis? In Hong Kong they protested against censorship.
I have written before about the Marxist origin of Black Lives Matter®. That doesnât appear to bother the news media, Leftists, or the corporations that shovel money into it like theyâre feeding a machine. Yes, Black Lives Matter⢠is a machine, but itâs not quite the machine that the liberal wine-aunts that listen to NPR© think it is.
But challenge Black Lives Matter© while working for a major corporation, even in good faith? Thatâs going to shorten your career.
Zac Kriegman worked for Thompson/Reuters®. âWorked forâ is the proper tense. Kriegman had a bachelor’s in economics topped with a law degree from Harvard® and was working for Thompson/Reuters© leading their efforts in artificial intelligence. His pronoun is: âWas.â
A friend go fired from a keyboard factory for not putting in enough shifts.
Then he posted an essay on the internal servers. You can read it here (LINK). What was the sin he got fired for? Objecting to the bias he saw at Thompson/Reuters⢠and then, worst of all, proving via statistics that Black Lives Matter© and the Thompson/Reuters© narrative was . . . a lie. A longer version of Kriegmanâs story can be found here (LINK). Thanks to Ricky for both of those links.
The results are clear. According to the Tuskegee Institute (who apparently are the official counters of such things) a total of 3, 446 black people were lynched between 1882 and 1968. Based on Kriegmanâs data, itâs entirely likely that Black Lives Matterâs⢠focus on âdefunding the policeâ along with the Ferguson and Minneapolis Effects, that Black Lives Matter© killed more blacks in three years than lynching ever did in 86 years.
It is clear that facts like these have to be suppressed. Thatâs why Zac Kriegman was fired. At Thompson/Reutersâ¢, the Truth doesnât matter â just adherence to the Narrative.
But . . . why?
The answer is that the real goal (regardless of the stated goal) of Black Lives Matter© has nothing to with making the lives of black people better. This is obvious from one initiative alone: defunding the police.
No, no I really donât.
I am skeptical of all police. I tend to think that many police officers will do as theyâre told, no matter who tells them, and no matter what they tell them. History has proven that most cops will go collect guns from lawful owners or round up people for the âvaxxâ camps if theyâre told to.  Donât believe me? Check out Australia.
But if I were a cop in the liberal utopias where Leftists have put a target on my back, Iâd do the bare minimum, while looking for a job anywhere outside places where arrests are irrelevant because the Soros-funded DA has installed a revolving door on the jail. Oddly, this is exactly the desired result. Soros wants chaos on the streets, and has found that cops wonât arrest people that wonât go to prison. Those people are then left on the street, where they keep committing crimes until they get bored enough to kill someone.
Combine the following ingredients:
- inflamed rhetoric noting that no problem in the black community is the responsibility of blacks,
- occasional âmartyrâ victims that are selected not because of their innocence, but because the story (Ferguson) or video (Minneapolis) of the incident makes people really mad,
- aggressive ignoring of the reality documented in FBI statistics that black neighborhoods are amazingly violent places â 58% of all people murdered in 2020 in the U.S. were black, and 54% of people arrested for murder in 2020 in the U.S. . . . were black, and
- a news media, Thompson/Reuters⢠included, that is all-in on the propaganda and what do you get?
More death.
Arguing that having fewer cops in the areas where most of the murders are taking place will make things better isnât magical thinking â itâs intentional murder. Regardless of the reasons that black people are killing themselves â having fewer cops around wonât help the situation.
According to BLMâ¢, thatâs okay. The goal of Black Lives Matter© obviously has nothing to do with helping actual black people. What is it, then, that theyâre up to?
The real goal of Black Lives Matter® is to create enough discontent and pain in the black community so that theyâll accept any solution. Of course, the solution that the Left proposes is based on increased discipline, improving morality, focusing on keeping families intact, creating a culture of personal responsibility, and rigorous academic performance.
Ha! Just kidding! Itâs literally the opposite of all of those things. The current Leftist solution is like trying to help Charlie Sheen via giving him more porn stars and cocaine.
Charlieâs tested positive for everything except the ârona . . . .
And companies that support BLM© are complicit. In the case of Thompson/Reuters© they reported uncritically on false claim that BLM⢠made. This, of course, provided oxygen for the fire. Large companies then threw on bushels of cash, which provided more fuel. The result?
Thousands of people, most of them black, who would now be alive except for Black Lives Matter⢠are now dead.  These people had been utterly abandoned by their local politicians, media, and the large companies that earn Social Justice® points by pandering to those same NPR© liberal wine aunts.
The goal is simple:  to create an army of discontent people to increase violence and chaos. Itâs always easier to destroy than to build â and this idea is to destroy everything, leaving an America thatâs hollowed out â a place with no center. Thatâs what Leftists are good at.
Building and creating? Not so much.
But at least black people donât have to worry about lynching now. They can just worry about how Black Lives Matter⢠is going to âhelpâ them next instead.
Currently Reading:Â The Dark Forest by Cixin Liu