Stan:Â Â I got a hundred-dollar check from my grandma and my dad said I need to put it in the bank so it can grow over the years.
Bank Manager: That’s fantastic, a really smart decision, young man.  We can put that check in a money market mutual fund, then we’ll re-invest the earnings into foreign currency accounts with compounding interest aaaand . . . it’s gone. â South Park
I hear the Slovakian banks moved to digital currency. They ran out of Czechs. It’s okay, it’ll be fine.
Last week we talked about the Angle of Repose (The Funniest Post You Will Ever Read About Angles of Repose, Virgin Physicists, Economics, and Population).  The conclusion, stated briefly is that our economy and indeed our civilization can be compared to a sandcastle. Like a sandcastle, the economy is built out of a myriad of individual particles, glued together by innovation, hope, aspiration, and desire to watch free naught movies on the Internet. Like a sandcastle, if the conditions arenât just right, the walls of the sandcastle can crumble in a growing cascade. An even faster way to make the castle fall is to drop a shot put on it. Itâs especially fun if the five year old that made it is still working on it when you drop the shot put.
Sadly this Canadian shot putter was disqualified after it was identified she was taking age-accelerating drugs to age more quickly so she could qualify for the Senior Olympics®. Her only defense was, âI identify as 86 years old.â
Unlike a sandcastle, our economy isnât made of grains of sand of rough uniformity. If the average personâs net worth of $97,000 was a single grain of sand weighing 0.011 grams, Jeff Bezosâ $110 billion dollars would be a 28 pound steel ball, the perfect size to ruin a kidâs day. But even that isnât large compared to a bank. JP Morganâs® $2.5 trillion dollar assets when compared to that single grain of sand would weigh nearly 624 pounds. If I had to pick between lifting 624 pounds of steel or 624 pounds of butane, Iâd choose the butane. Why? Itâs a lighter fluid.
I imagine this toddler weighs about 28 pounds. Itâs a perfect competition size toddler, depending on the shape of its head, of course. Sadly, I canât throw one farther than about 35 feet.
The size and scale of international banks today is huge, and Iâll admit when I put together the weight comparison above, it was the first time that the vast scale of the international banks was even slightly comprehensible, though mind boggling â it takes me from a weight I donât notice, to a weight that Iâd have to use both arms to lift. Okay, Iâm lying. Maybe if I put my back into it I could lift it with one arm.
Thankfully, my net worth actually weighs less than pocket lint.
In the 1984, a bank named Continental Illinois® was failing. As the cratering price of crude oil hit, the bank experienced massive losses. Fearing a bank collapse, depositors pulled their money, but of course the bank had loaned it out. Continental Illinois⢠was bailed out through a combination of cash infusions ($5.5 billion), emergency loans ($8 billion), and change the Federal Reserve® found in Paul Volkerâs couch cushions. In congressional hearings about the matter, a congressman noted that Continental Illinois© was âtoo big to fail.â The phrase had been used before, but this time it stuck â a Google⢠search for âtoo big to failâ brings up about 5 million pages, most of which are about Amy Schumer.
The reason that they bailed out Continental Illinois© wasnât that they were good natured. The reason that the Federal government bailed out Continental Illinois was that they were scared to death â they had no idea what would happen if they just let the bank fail. Would it bring down the economy? No one knew â and just like wondering exactly whatâs in a hot dog, no one was willing to find out. And donât tell me whatâs in a hot dog, Iâm pretty sure I donât want to know.
What were people worried about?
I asked my bank teller to check my balance, and he tried to push me over. Nah, Iâm kidding. He threw a snake at me. I should stop keeping my money at the river bank.
A bank failure to most people is nearly risk-free. The FDIC® (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation©) extends insurance to cover more money than the average family is worth. But a small business or farm, even one that doesnât have a multi-million dollar net worth, might have enough money moving through the account that a bank failure might trigger that small business to fail since its cash was . . . gone.
If that business had debts to other banks, it would then be in default, and cause a loss at the next bank. If the next bank doesnât fail, there are still problems. The next bank will lend out money only to customers that it knows will pay it back â if it has sustained losses it wonât want to make loans that are risky. A small town farm bank failure is bad and might devastate a community if it causes other businesses to fail.
When Continental Illinois⢠started to fail, it was the seventh largest bank in the nation. No one had any idea what its failure would do to the country, so it was not allowed to fail. The government looked for someone to buy it, but they had no luck â like a Leftist spending his own money, a buyer for a massive bank that is failing is fairly difficult to find.
But letâs go back to JP Morgan®. How did it get so big? If you rewind the clock, the average size of a bank used to be pretty small, operations used to be limited to a single state, and there were no branches â each bank in each town was an independent entity. Sure, one person might have owned more than one bank; even dozens of banks. Each bank, however, had to stand on its own.
With that kind of small exposure in both size and location, banks limited the damage that they could do if they failed â over 9,000 banks failed during the Great Depression. Sure, that was devastating, but I would argue that the failure of just one bank, JP Morgan®, would far exceed the damage that was caused by the failure of those 9,000 banks, each of which certainly weighed less than a toddler.
I was going to add transparent bikini graphics, but The Boy went off to college so youâll have live with these.Â
Is there an argument for large banks? Paul Krugman thinks so. And if Paul Krugman is for it, Iâm probably against it. If Paul Krugman said that Wilder, Wealthy and Wise⢠was his favorite blog? I would argue with him, even if it involved a knife fight, which would probably work out okay for me because heâs old and weak and I smell like hamburger. Krugmanâs argument is, more or less, that bigger banks are more efficient so we should regulate them properly and let them live.
My counter to Krugmanâs drivel is that is that the banking regulators are not working for the Federal government, they are working for the banks. Most banking regulators want to work for the big banks, because thatâs where the money is. Actually regulating the bank would doesnât look good on your resume. This isnât my imagination: I actually had this conversation with a banker who had been a regulator. His conclusion was the only real way to get fired as a Federal banking regulator was to do your job. Come in late? Go to sleep at work? Surf porn on the Federal computers? All thatâs fine. But ask Wells Fargo® to follow the law?
I smell a firing.
Big banks create a risk to the very existence of our current economic system since they have the unique ability to take profits when things are going well, but if they screw up? You and I are paying. I rate this risk as not as bad a risk as the drunken sailors masquerading as politicians in Washington, but still a pretty big risk.
From the above, I think itâs obvious what the downside is to having larger banks, since they risk our economy as a whole, and thatâs not even mentioning Modern Monetary Theory (The Worst Economic Idea Since Socialism, Explained Using Bikini Girl Graphs), or fiat currencies (Rome, Britain, and Money: Why You Canât Find Fine China after the Apocalypse). And, make no mistake â the failure rate for all businesses nears 100% over a long enough timeline. Just ask Tyler Durden.
I Am Joeâs Inflamed Uvula.
Whatâs the downside of breaking banks into smaller units, and perhaps limiting their capitalization to what Jeff Bezos keeps in his âspare mistressâ account?
- First, thereâs more overhead. You need competent people to run the various independent branches, but what you get is the resiliency of an inefficient system â the risks that will cause all of the banks to fail are remote. So, breaking apart banks would lead to more jobs for competent people. Yes, that would lead to lower profits for the banks. Yes, Iâm a capitalist. No, thatâs not bad.
- Second, if theyâre limited to geographic regions, the banks that are in regions that might become economically depressed would have less money to lend. Thatâs probably okay. Iâm pretty sure I donât want money from my state going to those heathens in Rhode Island, so Iâm okay keeping it nearby. Besides, if there are good opportunities here? Money will flow in.
- Third, smaller banks could That would make investors more likely to keep an eye on their investment. And if bad things happened? Theyâd be limited to failures that we could deal with, like forgetting to pay the cable bill. Somebody nag me on Friday.
- Fourth, it would be harder to borrow a few billion dollars. Okay, this can be solved several other ways for the legitimate requests to borrow a billion dollars, like needing to buy a first edition .
Even with smaller banks, some of the conveniences like ATMs could still remain in business â that sort of networked information exists now, so it could exist in the future.
I brought up the example of Continental Illinois© bank. The name wasnât at all familiar to me, but I did look up what happened to them. Continental Illinois® was sold to Bank of America⢠in the 1990âs. Bank of America© is the second largest bank in the country.
How to solve the problem of too big to fail?
Make the too big to fail banks even bigger. Is that a problem? Is dropping a 624 pound shot put on a sandcastle a problem?
Nah, itâll be fine.
This graphic is 6 years old. The problem is A LOT worse now.
http://demonocracy.info/infographics/usa/fdic/fdic.html
The FDIC works. As long as things are fine.
The too-big-to-fail banks of today listed in the bikini graph are WAY beyond ever being saved by the FDIC.
The FDIC is for chump-change mom-and-pop local banks that run checking accounts for Joe Sixpack. Banks like these:
https://cr4re.com/PBLAug2019.html
Rescue operations for the Big Five banks (rescue operations that been running full-blast in the past week since last Tuesday) is run not by the FDIC but by The Fed. Last week The Fed injected OVER A QUARTER TRILLION DOLLARS into distressed too-big-to-fail banks. The Fed continuing to run the rescue firehose this week, still trying to put out the flames.
https://zh-prod-1cc738ca-7d3b-4a72-b792-20bd8d8fa069.storage.googleapis.com/s3fs-public/styles/inline_image_desktop/public/inline-images/term%20repo%20ny%20fed.jpg?itok=ezRvzsF6
Out there in the flaming and smoldering financial rubble not being covered by the MSM, some of these too-big-to-fail banks getting saved by The Fed are not even American banks. Let that sink in.
https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/excess%20reserves%209.21.jpg?itok=yrum0rMc
Yes – when did we become the world’s fire brigade?
Not believing in providing hookers and blow to the cable companies, I never was able to watch much South Park. But that one bit, AAAaaand it’s gone!, is not only one of the funniest gags ever, it really is all you need to know about our economy. Ignore the lesson at your own risk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRRs0BrBDx0
Excellent post, BTW.
I laughed so hard when I saw that one. The truth provides the best humor.
I’m going to tell a hotdog story.
My dad was a veterinarian and spent most of his career working for the USDA in meat inspection. I was with him one day when he was buying hotdogs. He was sorting through the choices and bypassing several different brands at various price points. I finally realized that he was looking at the seal on the package that showed which facility the hotdogs came from. He finally found the seal he wanted and we bought those.
I think that there’s a moral to the story about picking hotdogs that applies to banks but I just can’t quite make it.
Opie Odd
I love the comment! And I need to get another bank.
Hold on a sec, John Wilder.
You mention the word ‘assets’ while discussing bankers.
How do you or I define ‘assets’?
Obviously, an asset is a durable physical item in our possession such as a few thousand rounds of .303 Brit for those bolt-g*ns we might or might not keep buried in a forest hermitage someplace.
How do bankers define ‘assets’?
Loans.
Functional loans == paying interest == are the only assets of bankers.
Cash aka Federal Reserve Promissory Notes sitting in an account is a liability.
Why?
Bankers understand the value of the promises of other bankers.
If bankers were honest, they might say “they aren’t worth the paper they’re written on”.
Oh, man! That was a good one!
I combined ‘honest’ and ‘bankers’ in one sentence.
Hilarious!
I know, I know… I should take this show on the road.
It’s a gift.
“If bankers were honest” – yeah, they weed that out. I think there’s a joke about neckties in there.
Here’s an excellent summary of what’s going on presented as a murder mystery. The US Dollar is the vic.
https://realinvestmentadvice.com/who-could-have-known-what-the-repo-fiasco-entails/
Zimbabwe, here we come . . .
The ongoing too-big-to-fail bank rescue operation just keeps getting better and better! Yesterday’s cash givaway by the Fed to failing banks was so oversubscribed that the Fed is gonna raise the daily giveaway amount from $75 billion to $100 billion dollars!
https://zh-prod-1cc738ca-7d3b-4a72-b792-20bd8d8fa069.storage.googleapis.com/s3fs-public/styles/inline_image_desktop/public/inline-images/2019-09-25_5-45-46.jpg?itok=xXHoVktS
https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/dollar-liquidity-crisis-accelerates-month-end-nears-record-92-billion-demand
This looks like a well that has no bottom.
“Krugman’s argument is, more or less, that bigger banks are more efficient so we should regulate them properly and let them live.”
Efficient? Big banks are less efficient, and the saying should be “They are too big to be allowed to exist.”
I opened a safe deposit box at a Wells Fargo. I provided everything the locals wanted and they gave me a key. Then letters started arriving saying some additional information was needed, but it didn’t say what. It gave me an 800 number and suggested I talk to people at my local branch. The letter was from an office 1000 miles away, and was not signed.
No one at the local branch knew what was missing. The voice at the 800 number had no idea what was needed. No one could track down the office that sent the mail (hmmm – could offices that send mail be related to guns that create violence?)
After a few months of increasingly shrill threats I emptied the box and turned in the key. I told the local branch manager “Wells Fargo is too big to be allowed to exist.”
Break it up. Break it up now. Max bank size? Maybe $20 billion. It’s a start.
When I worked as a manager for one of the biggest banks around, it rhymes with Chase, it was an absolute meatgrinder. When you had an issue you had to call an internal helpline which was staffed like an AOL helpline with Indians and Pakistanis that still bartered with chickens instead of using currency and of course didn’t speak English. The life expectancy of a personal banker was about 18 month, long enough to get them trained and licensed and then ride them like Seabiscuit to sell products to customers that they mostly didn’t need until they went crazy or quit. The other bank I worked for was not quite as large but the unethical practices they pushed made me pretty ashamed to work there. That is just at the branch level. In the big offices where people are monkeying around with phony crap like derivatives it is even worse. The model is supposed to be: person A deposits money in a bank and is paid interest, person B borrows that money and pays the bank interest. The spread between the two is profit and the bank is basically a facilitator. Now it is all about fees and financialization and weird monetary scams.
Unfortunately it is getting harder to bank “locally”. We have lived where we are for 8 years and our little local bank keeps getting bought by slightly bigger, less local, rivals. The best advice is to stay clear of the financial system as much as you can because it is all smoke and mirrors.
It is. Complicated is rarely better for you. And I thought I’d see you on this one!
Working in banking was the only job I felt bad about doing. It got so I couldn’t look at myself in the mirror so I had to get out. I used to keep a copy of my monthly sales targets in my desk at subsequent jobs to remind me that whatever I was doing was better than being a banker.
The fun part is that the really big banks don’t even use real money. “Fractional reserve banking” means different things at different scales. For small banks (5% reserve), it means they can only loan out 95% of the money they have on deposit. For large investment banks (3% reserve), it means they can loan out 3300% of what they have on deposit. You read that right. Investment banks make up the loans out of nothing. (Just like the federal reserve does.) That’s how the stock market derivatives trade moves more money around than has ever existed in the history of the world.
True! And when it contracts . . . oh my.