“No, I quite approve of terror, arson, murder, any tool that serves the revolution.” –Nicholas and Alexandra
I wonder if this came as a peasant surprise to the nobility?
The worm has turned on Biden. Pardon me if I say that this is right on schedule. Trump document frenzy made the Left drool like Amy Schumer when she’s near a cake or AOC when she’s near a new coloring book. To get Trump, the Left would do anything. Anything.
In a very real sense, just as the Left views abortion as a sacrament, the destruction of Trump is a religious goal, as he is the manifestation of their supreme Evil being.
This is nothing new. Remember when George W. Bush was president? His politics were, essentially, as controversial as lukewarm dishwater. But the hate flew strong. Until he started showing up in group hot tub photos with Bill and Hillary and Barack and Mooshell. Then he was no longer the Prince of Darkness, instead just a fuddy-duddy old man who chose wrong.
I’m really glad I couldn’t find the hot tub photos.
Biden, though, is in as bad a shape politically as he is mentally. Joe was (s)elected for the job because he has never really stood for anything in particular, so he’ll stand for anything at all. Even his “memories” are false half the time, talking about things that never happened so that he looks the best to whoever he’s talking to at the moment.
The perfect candidate.
Who is in control then? One would first point to the Chief of Staff, but that person just quit. It’s clear that half of his appointees have little to no competence at anything – I’m fairly certain that only one or two of them could pass the probation period making pizzas at Chuck E. Cheese™.
Kamala says her body is a temple. Everyone is allowed in.
So, I’m not at all sure who is running the show, but we all know it’s not Joe. And whoever is running the show is done with him. Will they force him to step down? Maybe. It would be chaotic, and risky. Replacing kneepads as Veep would require a majority vote – of both the House and the Senate. Since the Republicans hold the House, this would not necessarily be an easy choice.
Even if Joe survives (politically) to 2024, the only reason to have him run again would be for the amusement factor. It’s also clear that the person who will eventually replace Joe is not Kamala. Oh, sure, she might do that until the next election if Joe’s forced to resign, but “they” will make sure that she’s not allowed to do anything of particular importance. Maybe she could do coloring books with AOC.
Someone asked her why the chicken crossed the road. She said, “It’s because of corporate greed! Chickens should not be forced to lay eggs – the eggs should lay themselves!”
The danger is the weak leadership combined with the political polarization and the hidden nature of those who are actually running the government. This seems to me to be very similar to the period before the French Revolution.
- A weak leader,
- Massive governmental debt leading to economic crisis,
- A significant rural/city divide,
- A significant atheist/religious divide,
- Political polarization fueled by agitators, and
- Silly clothing styles.
One of the interesting things to me are those agitators. They were clearly in place at the time of the French Revolution since the Leftist (the French Revolution is where the name “Leftist” came from) pamphlets that appeared “spontaneously” and the large number of inflammatory newspapers that were designed to fuel the Revolution, primarily in Paris.
I tried to tell a guillotine joke, but I always mess up the execution.
The effort was too large and too well coordinated to be an accident. Was Marat, the lizard-skinned angry little toad of a man the leader? Was Robespierre?
In the end, it didn’t matter.
The Revolution gave way to the Terror, where (thankfully) Robespierre and Marat were finally executed. They had to be executed, since, once any Leftist revolution starts, it keeps moving Left in great gouts of blood until someone has the gumption to kill everyone that’s to the extreme Left. Stalin learned that lesson, and purged Trotsky along with millions of others.
The end result has almost always been the same as what happened in France. Tired of the nonsense coming from the anarchy they accepted a new Emperor, this time one named Bonaparte rather than Bourbon.
What position would Quasimoto play at Notre Dame? Probably halfback.
The playbook is the same, and it seems to follow the same parameters over time. Understand that as the statues were pulled down from Notre Dame, and as it was transformed from a church into the “Temple of Reason” that we’re seeing the same things today. The Left removes the past, because nothing can come before – they see this as a cleansing, the ability to return to “Year Zero”.
The future does not repeat, exactly. The Russian Revolution wasn’t the same as the French, but they certainly rhymed. As I look to weak leadership, polarization, economic difficulty, and Amy Schumer, I see the same conditions that existed back in 1789.
I’m still interested in who is going to benefit . . . if there’s less Amy Schumer, then everyone.