Birthright Citizenship, The Economics Of Infinity, And The Inevitability Of War

“I want immunity from prosecution, asylum in the U.S., and citizenship.” – xXx

All media “as-found”

June 30, 2026, just shy of the 250th Anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, will live in infamy.

All five women of the Supreme Court voted for birthright citizenship on June 30. This includes the Chief Justice, John Roberts, who I assume identifies as a woman on Tuesdays and alternate weekends.

The five voted that popping a kid out anywhere that the United States has as a state or territory makes the invader kid a citizen. It’s called “birthright citizenship”, and wasn’t really a thing for the first 60 or so years, at least, of the 14th Amendment. The 14th was really about removing doubts about the citizenship status of freed black slaves and their children.

But now, if you’re Consuela from Caracas giving birth in Carlsbad, California, your cholo child is a citizen. If you’re Ning Naun from Nanking, giving birth in Nashua, New Hampshire, your nursling nipper is now a national. That’s the law of the land, even if you are here illegally.

This effectively removes the border.

If an illegal steps one foot into Arizona and squats a tot, the squatted tot is just as American as Neil Armstrong. If a woman on a legal visa drops a moppet, even if she overstays? It’s an American citizen, just as American as Mark Twain.

The American people, therefore, have no say in who becomes an American.

It’s like someone breaks into my house and pops a preemie there and now that preschooler is now my child and I have to treat it like my child and give it exactly the same (or better!) treatment as my other kids even though it’s much stupider, much needier, and much more violent.

I guess I would be fine with that if I hated my own kids.

But I don’t. I love my kids. And, I love my people.

I’ve gone over at length in previous posts how immigrants, both legal and illegal, are a net negative on the country as a whole economically. It’s not really arguable because the facts are so stark.

Why they’ve been allowed is simple.

For the GloboLeftElite, they represent a new voter bloc that’s skewed to vote against nationalism and for communism.

For the Institutional Elite, they represent more demand for their services and more job for their gay friends.

For the “Idaho Rancher” they represent a way to get cheap labor and avoid paying the prices it would take for Americans to do the work, and the “Idaho Rancher” doesn’t have to pay for the services like medical and child care and prisons.

For the “Wall Street Firm” it’s a way to get cheap labor that will never say no, and will never report you for doing something shady.

These groups are all traitors.

You could say “enlightened economic self-interest” but you’d be wrong. They are the ticks that view the United States as an economic zone to be sucked into an empty skin sack for profits or as a place to build political power for ideas that are inimical to our way of life.

I’m not an extremist.

I’m not opposed 100% to immigration. I think we should consider starting it again in 2326 after a 200-year moratorium. I mean, we should consider it then. Maybe.

The problem with this ruling is two-fold. I’ll start with the economic. There are between 400 million and 700 million people that would move to the United States if they could. Iowa would soon look like Islamabad, Pakistan. Lubbock, Texas would soon look like Lagos, Nigeria. Diluting the ability of the nation to make wealth won’t make us wealthier, it will just turn our country into a slum.

If it were only economic, I might be able to make the case that this was okay. We’d eventually catch up in wealth production. Eventually.

But it won’t, and that’s because of the second problem:

Genetics leads to culture leads to virtue leads to politics leads to outcomes.

That’s it. You can’t take 100, or 1,000 or 10,000,000 Nigerians and expect them to create anything but Nigeria. Same thing with Indians. Or Danes. Or Chinese. Studies of twins separated at birth prove that heritability not only of intellectual ability, but also attitudes and behaviors. Why are Indians turning Canada into India?

Because that’s what Indians do. Because that’s what Indians are. If you want your country to look like India, import more Indians. If you don’t want your country to look like India, don’t let them in.

And if you go back to my map, culture leads to virtue. This is the true failing of multicultural societies, since they cannot form a shared sense of virtue. Why are there rape gangs wherever Indians or Pakistani or Sub-Saharan Africans congregate, even in countries that don’t consider rape a spectator sport?

Because rape is okay in their culture, and if they bring their culture to Dublin, they’ll rape in Dublin. Look it up. It’s not a “because they’re in the United States or Europe” thing, it’s who they are. If only the most rape-y breed, well, then the people will become genetically more rape-y. So what happens when their people become the cops?

Pit bulls are different than golden retrievers. Wishing won’t make it less so, and why are we allowing a never-ending stream of pit bulls into the country?

Lee Kuan Yew, the father of modern Singapore said:

I started off believing all men were equal. I now know that’s the most unlikely thing ever to have been, because millions of years have passed over evolution, people have scattered across the face of this earth, been isolated from each other, developed independently, had different intermixtures between races, peoples, climates, soils . . . I didn’t start off with that knowledge. But by observation, reading, watching, arguing, asking, that is the conclusion I’ve come to.

If a country cannot determine who is allowed to become a citizen, then the result will be a multi-cultural society. What happens then? If the societies are close and have time, they can grow together, the British and Irish. Oh, wait.

To enforce a true multicultural society requires strong, swift, and sure enforcement of the rules. There was a 19-year-old American in Singapore who was caned in Singapore in 1994.

Why?

The American was being an ass. He deserved it. But also because Singapore has to be strict and severe because it is multi-cultural. To maintain a multi-cultural society that doesn’t turn into Mad Max® requires at least three of the four: justice, discipline, authoritarianism, and prosperity.

The alternative to that?

War.

War is not solely men in uniforms ranked in order on opposing sides of a line. If we encouraged people to move to a foreign country to take control, that would be war. How is that different from what India is doing? How is that different from what Islam is doing? How is that different from what Haiti . . . okay, skip that, Haiti isn’t bright enough to have a strategy more complicated than cannibalism.

In a multi-cultural society, it becomes a free-for-all, a war of all against all.

Multicultural societies don’t blend into harmony because we wish it so. History shows the exact opposite. But, hey, we’ve either got caning or cannibalism to look forward to, so there’s that.

Author: John

Nobel-Prize Winning, MacArthur Genius Grant Near Recipient writing to you regularly about Fitness, Wealth, and Wisdom - How to be happy and how to be healthy. Oh, and rich.

58 thoughts on “Birthright Citizenship, The Economics Of Infinity, And The Inevitability Of War”

  1. I don’t know that anyone has saved Polaroid and Super-8 Kompromat from the 70s of John Roberts. I just know that that would explain a lot.

    1. Rumor is that it’s related to an adoption, and it came down when Obama leaned on him.

  3. The court ruling is merely confirming what has been in practice for decades. Even had they ruled differently, there are thousands of leftists and lawyers who’ve been diligently ensuring merka was flooded with nonwhites. As a former consular officer, even before I was consciously pro-White, I never issued a visa to a pregnant woman. Yet I recently saw a clip of a British visa officer detaining a 32 week pregnant Nigerian en route to the US, to whom some US visa officer had blithely issued a visa. I skim all the World Cup videos of Europeans loving the US, and all I can think of is all the nonwhites who also got ‘tourist’ visas to come watch the games and who will never leave. And despite decades of computers and now AI, we still have no system to track all the “tourists” who never leave.

    And regarding the quote of the originator of the stupid birthright doctrine (another gift of ‘freeing’ noggers), since he only specified it didn’t apply to the children of ‘diplomats,’ the Chinese Ambassador’s kid doesn’t get citizenship, but his driver’s kid – who isn’t on the ‘diplomatic list’ – does. Idiocy piled upon idiocy, year after year after year. People who get a ‘tourist’ visa claiming an intended ‘visit’ for a few weeks, who then get a job and an ostensible US spouse and leave everything behind, and ‘legally’ “adjust status.” Which means they lied getting their initial visa, but nothing ever happens, and they then parade about as ‘legal immigrants.’

    They are ALL ILLEGAL – even those with magic papers. And idiot merkans who allow their idiot wives and kids to befriend them or hire them or shop at their businesses just reinforces the idiocy. It is far too widespread and ingrained to stop with even the ‘correct’ court ruling. I’m not a doomer, but I am a damned realist. I know what I’ve seen and experienced living in 5 countries outside the US, and dealing with or being part of the embassy staff therein. The entire State Department and all the lawyers need to be removed from existence, in addition to all the nonwhites. Sorry, folks, but there is no voting our way out of this, no magic court ruling our way out of this, and no guarantee of shooting our way out of this. And given demographics and birthrates, the outlook is pretty grim. More than 50% of ‘merkans’ under 24 – back in 2023 – were nonwhite. And the numbers worsen day by day, birth by birth.

    1. You are right. There is no voting our way out of this. All of the clown show bluster taking place in Thune Land will come to naught. Any bill conceived will be watered down with some kind of Grandfather Clause. The only situation which will change things will be a Deus ex Machina event. That could be a False Flag perpetrated by the CIA or our (((Greatest Ally))). Or we could just go Weimar 2.0. And come to think of it, since all of these “Anchor Babies” and their FEDGOV remora families are on the dole, that would be a much better outcome: Millions of broke parasites rioting and looting in all the Blue Hives while the Orcs and Orcettes with badges are running for their very lives. Sporty and unpleasant times are ahead. Plan accordingly. Bleib ubrig.

    2. Thank you. I know that we’ve got our backs to the wall, but I also know that cornered white men fight like nothing else on Earth.

  4. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Douglass writes:

    “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them, and these will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.”

  6. John, excellent thoughts in this column, as usual, and in the comments as well.
    I suggest that you remove “On” and “but” from your opening paragraph.

  7. Multicultural societies don’t blend int harmony because we wish it so.

    Multicultural societies don’t blend into harmony because we wish it so.

  8. So – you want a Supreme Court that rules on the Constitution according to the whims of the times? The issue of birthright citizenship was discussed when the 14th Amendment was being debated in Congress – and they were fine with it apply to the “illegal immigrants” of the time. So SCOTUS made an originalist interpretation. The 2nd Amendment applies to the states because of the 14th. Would you want a liberal court to say the states have full authority to limit guns because that is the way the “living document” should be read in modern times?

    Congress can fix this easily (though they won’t – but that’s a Congress problem). Make it a federal crime for illegals to give birth in the US. The KID gets the free citizenship as the 14th demands. The PARENTS go to jail for 10 years, pay a million dollar fine, and are deported back home. The KID stays in the US (in a foster home) and the PARENTS never see or hear from him again.

    1. “they were fine with it apply to the “illegal immigrants” of the time.”

      Did you read the article? For 60 years it was assumed this did not apply to foreigners, with the drafter explicitly stating that. It was only intended to settle the question of whether slaves and the children of slaves were citizens.

      1. The yellow highlighted quote about foreigners speaks of not including ambassadors or foreign ministers yet states “but will include every other class of persons.” So yes, I did read it. I also read https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/25-365 which is the court decision. SCOTUS rendered an originalist interpretation – as they should.

        1. You are retarded, and lack basic reading comprehension.

          “foreigners, aliens” are included in the list of people excluded from birthright citizenship.

    2. Yep. Not only that the Trump Team had everything lined up for the SCOTUS decision today.

      Both the affirmation and the dissent noted that the problem must be fixed via Congressional legislation and Mr. Thomas the Great wrote a novella length treatise on how to do it.

      Five minutes after the decision dropped a republican Congresscritter launched the Henry Reed bill banning birthright citizenship. A Dem bill that has just got SCOTUS pre-approval.

      Don’t go wobbly Mr. Wilder!

      Also “All five women of the Supreme Court” –?

      Perfect!

      Your puns Monday were also groaners!

    3. Not true…It was made clear by the sponsors that it would not apply to foreigners, not even foreign diplomats…It was strictly to assure that ex-slaves would become citizens…

    4. No. First, the 2nd was not limited to “Congress shall make no . . .” it was “shall not be abridged”. Period.

      They were not. For example, American Indians, born in states, were not citizens. That’s a tall wall, my friend.

  9. Amen, brother. I’m a new subscriber, and this is one of your best. Thank you.

    1. You mean ZioHedge? I would assess the likelihood of this piece being posted there as less than Zero, as this ruling cements into place one of the chief initiatives of the little hats; namely, the overwhelming of traditional White citizens through not so surreptitious mass invasion, and demographic mass destruction. And, in support of my view, if you read the ownership statement on their site, ZioHedge is owned by a wing of ABC, and you don’t get more antiWhite than that.

      So, circulate this piece among the like-minded on your own initiative, because that is how it will attain broader dissemination. I found this piece at Western Rifle Shooters site, bless their pointy little heads.

      I would like to be wrong, but I would be gobsmacked should it be picked up and cross-posted at today’s ZH, given the realities enumerated above.

    2. I posted it on The Burning Platform. I generally try to save my best stuff for that. When you see something you like, let me know, and I’ll cross post. I have no idea when people are going to really like a post. 🙂

  11. As VoxDay noted years ago, Diversity + Proximity = WAR.

    Coming to a city near you. Or yours.

  12. The conservatives keep wanting bigger government, and they keep getting it. In this they agree with the liberals. But government power is addictive, and most will abuse it. Didn’t some guy from an English university write several long books about a power-granting thing which seems useful and attractive, but also warps your mind towards evil?

    1. They’ve conserved nothing. They may be the worst.

      Yeah, that guy. Name’s on the tip of my tongue. By Gollum, I’m sure I’ll figure it out.

  13. Retarded commie fairytales won’t end well but it will be fun to see the stupid looks on faces as the crocodile doesn’t eat them last.
    Comrade kommissar Roberts is as ratty as it gets even if the sharing a chair with Ghislane in Hawaiian shirt is fake.

    1. True, Mr. Sido. But to quote the old phrase: “Who will bell the cat?” I cannot even fathom the layers of armed FEDORCS and FEDORCETTES the Black-Robed Druids have surrounding them. And the Sheeple, Normies, Cucks, Mall Zombies, and Remoras are going to be too busy glued to their big screens watching fireworks, flyovers, and Negro Ball this coming holiday weekend. Weimar 2.0 cannot come soon enough. We are all Luigi now. Amerika ist verloren. Bleib ubrig. – DTW.

      1. Should that happen, let’s hope, John, the Spirit of the Alamo is not dead.

  15. All the more reason to keep the borders closed, and prioritize the deportation of illegal migrants of child-bearing age. No visas for young women, period.

    Lathechuck

  16. “For the GloboLeftElite, they represent a new voter bloc that’s skewed to vote against nationalism and for communism.”

    This makes sense at first glance, but it doesn’t seem to be true. Elections can be fixed, and the winners of either party bought off. Who the voters are and what they vote for has been shown in many studies to be virtually irrelevant in determining what laws get passed.

    I think they truly do just hate us, and want to create chaos in order to institute an openly despotic rule to crush us.

    1. Well, they want it, and they won’t argue. But it’s also amazing how far Right South America has gone since USAID went tango uniform.

  17. I don’t know why people get all het up about this crap. Caring about current immigration laws and rates implies that there is a way to vote our way out of this. The demographic point of no return (through voting) was passed decades ago. The point of no return (through other means) doesn’t exist; there is always hope.

    2. This. When our guys stop with the appeals to the fiat authority and negotiating against our own interests by making the preservation of the system their primary goal then I will believe there is real opposition. The entire human ponzi of fusa is an economic trap that has everyone convinced that if they like their market they can keep their market while the other side erases our bloodline. Sure. Open borders stonks all time high. Trillionaire government contractor spreading snuff porn while his space junk vaporizes white Christians all over 404 for the same reasons we are stuck debating “the highest law” interpreted by invaders and women. Cue the military parades throwing candy to invader kids lining the main streets of “america”.

  18. Prov 22:7 The borrower is slave to the lender.

    DC is $40 trillion in debt. And they do their master’s, the owners of the global central banking system’s, bidding. Period. (The NDAA handing our military and intelligence community officially over to Israel fits in the same ‘Treason’ file and for the same reasons, executed by the same traitors).

    The nations that have a Rothschild central bank all do their debt holder master’s bidding. Period.

    DC and all other central bank owned nations feign to govern in accordance with each host nation’s laws, and in accordance with the voting wishes of their populous’. But reality is that the Rothschild Clan rules these governments and nations. All the rest is bloody suicidal/genocidal Kabuki.

  19. Ending meme: Yes, take care of the traitors first. But they’re not traitors by their terms. The US are not their nation (in the sense of having true and faithful allegiance to). Nor is any European country. We are all enemies who deserve to be exploited, humiliated, and tortured. It’s either revenge for what we supposedly did to them, or their ancestors, or those they claim to be their ancestors. Or it’s pre-venge for what they “know” we want to do to them for no reason at all.

    Psychological projection, cultural narcissism, and cult-like hatred of The Other are a nasty combination. The man on the street seems to be finally waking up, but I’m afraid it’s too little, too late.

    1. Reliably forcing a military win between people with the same technology background requires 3X the headcount of fighters for the winning side. Extermination of a people upon their own homeland requires 9X. Each fighter requires, given first world MIC gold plated hammers, 100X taxpayers to supply them. Now that the cartridge firearm has been invented, fighters don’t have to train for a lifetime to operate a sword or spear or bow. This means grandma in a wheelchair with a revolver can drive off three home invaders who aren’t that motivated to rob her in particular. Run all these numbers and you’ll discover the only reason the shrinking percentage of heritage Americans can lose are a) mental infection of self-loathing from mainstream media, and b) ignorance of these numbers.

    2. The uniparty wants chaos. TPTB are initiating a surveillance system that will control all dissent.

Comments are closed.