Chud The Builder And Two-Tiered Justice In America

“I got a new problem when I post bail.” – The Usual Suspects

“Chud the Builder” is an Internet provocateur/rage baiter who videos himself with strangers in public, often using racial slurs to black people.  His name is Dalton Eartherly, but I’ll stick with Chud.

Chud claims that it is within his free speech to say pretty much whatever he wants if he’s not threatening people.  I’ll leave it up to you to form your own opinion on that, but Chud isn’t shy about using the same words that black people use in songs to describe each other to them directly.

After going to court in Montgomery Coutney, Tennessee on a debt he owned, an altercation occurred.  I’d go into more details, but I’ve heard a lot of contradictory stories, so for now I’ll stick with that.  At some point, Chud drew his weapon and managed to get a two-fer:  Chud accidentally shot himself and he also shot a black man named Joshua Fox.  Both are alive.

There’s a lot to unpack with just this single case.  On X®, @RetroCoast said:

What?  $1.25 million?  I’ll admit that seems like a lot, but maybe that’s normal bail for Chud’s charge:  attempted murder.

Well, no.  In this age of free information flow, it’s now possible to get that data and share it quickly to millions.  OPERATION FREE DALTON went and got the receipts.

Outside of the scale being way off, it is clear that Chud’s bail is excessive compared to the average of $40,625 (hang on, I’ve got that in my other pocket) for other attempted murder cases.  It’s 31 times the average, assuming the data is right.

This was already a complicated case that touched on free speech and the right of self-defense, but now it’s bigger than that.  Chud could only have gotten a bail that high if he was much more dangerous than say, someone who was charged with first degree murder and aggravated assault.

Unless, you know, he was a white guy who said racist stuff on the Internet and it’s a high profile case.  That must be it.  Surely the system punishes white people and black people the same?

Huh.  I guess not.

And note that Chud will get zero support from mainstream groups dedicated to, say, defending those who want to promote free speech or the right to self-defense.  I could keep going.  But keep in mind that Karmello Anthony, who murdered Austin Metcalf by stabbing him in the chest has been out on $250,000 bail for nearly a year.

A system is what it does.

Think back to various high-profile self defense cases.  Kyle Rittenhouse and Daniel Penny were both acquitted of homicide, but what did their trials cost?  $1 million?  $2 million?  What about the Modern Sporting Lawyer who was arrested for protecting his home during the George Floyd Riots?  He pled to a deal.

No, what’s on trial is the ability for individuals to defend themselves, but a very special group of individuals:  white guys.  If you can’t be convicted, it doesn’t matter.  They’ll run you through the ringer of a court case costing millions if you don’t want to go to jail for the rest of your life.  And if you win?  Well, you’re broke, and the process was the punishment.  But if you’re black?

This is not the case if you’re black.  Stab away if you think there’s a good chance he might say a slur after you try to kill him.  And if you’re black you can try to fake a hate crime and the school you go to will cover up for you.

The statistics are clear:

This is so clear I’ll let Mr. Obvious point it out:

And I think the goal is also obvious:

There’s more to this story.  This is only one aspect.  Remember, a system is what it does.  What does the system react most strongly to?  What does it punish the hardest?

Author: John

Nobel-Prize Winning, MacArthur Genius Grant Near Recipient writing to you regularly about Fitness, Wealth, and Wisdom - How to be happy and how to be healthy. Oh, and rich.

43 thoughts on “Chud The Builder And Two-Tiered Justice In America”

  1. Never heard of Chud before all this, but you did an excellent job of summarizing the info and the precedents. Whites defending themselves against nonwhites is illegal in AINO. Whites trying to insulate themselves against having to defend themselves against nonwhites is illegal in AINO. And yet generations of Whites – worldwide – have been brainwashed into utter passivity in the face of active genocide. No IKAGO or NAXALT is worth a single White life, let alone the thousands raped, brutalized, and murdered year after year. Know your people, and defend your people. Not citizenship, not state, but people – race – extended family – – – or all shall perish.

    1. For the unenlightened among us, it’s me, I’m the unenlightened, would you please explain the meaning of IKAGO and NAXALT?

      1. IKAGO = I know a good one.
        NAXALT = not all X are like that, where X stands for some group, be it negroes or Serbs, or Catholics; you get the idea.

        Both are fallacies commonly committed while attempting to “disprove” true generalities.

        1. Thanks for the clarification, seems to me that folks using those phrases un-ironically fail to grasp the concept of the exception proving the rule.

    2. Chud was new to me, I saw him about a week before this hit. Yeah, the First Amendment works, except when talking to black people. And the Second Amendment doesn’t allow protecting yourself from black people, I guess.

  2. Your skin is your BDU. I admit to LOL over Chud the Builder’s video.
    I drop the occasional N bomb or call suburbans Carlton.
    Show weakness and you will get devoured.
    Life insurance by Pietro Beretta with the chamber never empty and safety off.

  3. We are in a race war and one side is supposed to not only pretend it isn’t happening but also ignore that every other racial group feels at least a little justification for harming them based on things neither party was involved in.

    1. I suspect that ‘race-war’ has something to do with keezer-xionist baby-eaters manipulating their brown bio-weapons.
      .
      “How so, LM, please explain!”
      Well, during an interview with vocalist Billy Corgan, frontman of alternative rock legends The Smashing Pumpkins, he notes the specific day owners and promoters of record companies switched from Rock to inner-city slum-trash gibberish ‘music’.
      .
      On that day in the mid-1990s, lyrics went from loving your lover and enjoying the sunshine — swimming at the beach — to kill LawEnforcementOfficials and take drugs and glorify career convicts.
      .
      Naturally, low-IQ brown excrement-heads thought that was a good idea.
      Lo and behold, it came to pass, a new class of despicableness emerged:
      * whiggers and mud-sharks.
      .
      The term ‘whiggers’ refers to LOW self-esteem Northern European Heritage folk.
      The term ‘mud-sharks’ refers to Northern European Heritage folk with pretty much ZERO self-esteem.

  4. Bail is not excessive when you consider he was already out on two other instances of bail, one for dine and dashing.

    1. Yeah, that dining and dashing is a real serious charge. And was the other charge public urination?

    2. Dining and dashing? The entire Red Lobster chain went completely bankrupt because blacks shared plates and didn’t pay for the all you can eat shrimp, which is essentially dine-and-dash.

    3. Yes, you’re right. A defensive pistol use plus a dine and dash (reportedly kicked out of a restaurant and declined to pay for food he was served but couldn’t eat because he was kicked out) is five times worse than a premeditated torture-murder.

  5. War requires offense and defense, we are in a surrender mode or more clearly described as a genocide. You know like Gaza where a minority people is killing people sworn to annihilate them. They have gonads we have yet to determine if we do or are still British.

    1. Sono,
      There was a time Northern European Heritage folk were somewhat less civilized about trespassers.
      A few of us showed up to play… and the entire Roman Empire tucked-tail and skedaddled back to the Med.

  6. The American legal system as it has become clearly does not serve Whites. Nor does it serve the concept of Justice, for that matter. Who does it serve? Who who who? Very mysterious, who these “Whos” might be. It’s a real headscratcher, that one.

    As to this jackass Chud (ALL live-streaming provocateurs are jackasses, regardless of race or ideology), I’m forced to support him because I hate hypocrisy and blatant INjustice more than I hate people being dicks. (And I HATE people being dicks.)

    Finally, below is a quote from a guy called Thrallman (apparently Asatru or something similarly neo-pagan); this is from a conversation about Orthodox Christianity, hence the religious context, but the principle applies to this Chud business.

    “Folkish (racist) paganism is not a religious commitment; it is a secular survival tactic. The Folk come first; folkish religion is an aid to their preservation. To fight the Jew, we must become like the Jew. In an ideal world, it would not be said that the ultimate question of right is “is it good for Whites?” But in a world that hates us, it is necessary. I believe that there is an abstract and ultimate good higher than Whiteness, but there is no sign that colored people think so, and so it is the greatest of follies to sacrifice White life to the advancement of those who are our open enemies.”

    1. To fight the Jew, we must recognize right order, then fight to establish it. The Jew hates order. The Jew hates order so much that he killed the Son of God, who is Truth itself. Fighting to establish order is what always defeats the Jew.

    2. The American legal system as it has become serves the Lenin/Stalin approach to Communism, which is to create uncertainty and terror and do the opposite of the laws middle class people want. This is to prepare the ground for Communism to replace Western Civilization more easily.

      The problem is psychopaths, not a particular ethnic/religious group. You don’t have to be tribal, you could merely judge evil behavior without regard to the background of the actor. You could form grand juries to put murderers in prison for life or execute them, so they can’t reoffend. But most won’t. You are the voting majority, and you vote to earn a Darwin award.

      1. I call bullcrap. Communism is a nice buzzword that boomers (and I am one, so spare me your “not all boomers”) like to throw around while still pretending that the 1980s under Reagan was the apotheosis of America. Who, pray tell, invented communism, hmmmn? Who made up the majority of the “Russian” revolutionaries in 1917? And just why did they want to replace Western Civilization? Most of them -despite the eternal claims of ‘antisemitism’ – were middle class and university students. They hated – and still hate – Western Civilization because it was built by the Greeks and Romans, White people, and Christianity. Thus they replaced BC/AD with their “BCE” (before ‘common’ era) and CE (common era). Not because it’s more accurate or explanatory, but simply to do what they could to remove any mention of Christ from learning and history.

        White people were more than ready to move past ‘tribalism’ and had done so for centuries, which is why they were able to create high trust societies, and stop marrying their cousins (or nieces, which is still a feature of some of the small hats). They couldn’t have built nation-states if they still limited trust and money and business and family to tribe only. So save your lectures for the nonwhites – 90% of the teeming world – who have always remained highly tribal. And it just so happens, funnily enough, that subsaharans – in particular – feature a high percent of psychopathy (not to mention 95% of them are retarded by White standards).

        In order to ‘judge evil’ without regard to the actor, one must first agree on a definition of such. And the nonwhites don’t consider lying or cheating or stealing or even killing those not of their tribe to be a bad thing – they consider it clever and a prime directive for their family and tribe’s future. Even when they superficially adopt Christianity, they retain those values – not to mention the fact that religious belief does nothing to change centuries of genetics. And today’s lost Whites – the 50% or so of Whites worldwide who are leftist and actively or passively antiWhite – agree with them in the guise of the false gods of “equality” and “anticolonialism” and “cultural relativism” and “their truth.”

        So you can keep your Darwin award, azzhat. Hope you and yours enjoy your “they will eat me last” fate while you flaunt your magic ‘principles’ instead of we primitives who preach tribalism for White survival.

        1. The top scores for genocide headcount in the 20th century are: 1. China, 2. China, 3. Russia, 4. Germany. That’s three different ethnic/religious groups. Furthermore, the ethnic group you want to attach all the blame to was a small minority, so it never had the headcount for votes or boots on the street to force itself on others.

          > In order to ‘judge evil’ without regard to the actor, one must first agree on a definition of such.

          Why would I let my enemy contribute to that definition? Especially by letting them tell me the problem isn’t their own voting choices, but instead that minority over there? Psychopathy and obedience is the problem, and it doesn’t matter if the persons doing it look like me or not. Do I care if my self-defense shooting was snitched out by the attacker’s friends, or by my neighbor Karen? I have the principle of looking at behavior instead of appearance-tribe because it’s a more accurate way to distinguish friend from enemy.

          1. The “Russians” who committed genocide were Jews – killing ethnic Russians. The Germans were responding to the takeover and destruction of their society by Weimar Jews. Perhaps check out Magnus Hirschfeld; it was his filth that was being burned in the famous photo of evil notsees burning books. And China? About 90% of the non-Han who were helping Mao at the time of the revolution were Jews – one of whom was his top advisor.

            Stow it; no need for hasbara lies here. Keep your atypical, left-end of the bell curve nonwhites and your magic principles. Your children will curse you as they are crushed by all your supposed ‘friends’ – like high IQ Han and magic noggers and vibrant mestizos and pungent hindus. Your mythic paradise will be a White hell – and you will thoroughly deserve it.

          2. Anon 2:12,
            .
            Remove the German people from your list of genociders, please.
            As we now know, everything we learned in school was a lie.
            .
            Instead, add over eight decades of Arabian people slaughtered by a borderless criminal syndicate masquerading as a religion.
            .
            During WW2 through their propaganda, that same mob of thugs slaughtered an unknown number of Northern European Heritage folk, both the German people and Americans.
            The dead are certainly in the millions; broken bodies and spirits are many millions more.
            .
            In your list of genociders, I am going to include brown bio-weapons in America.
            Every day, thousands of Northern European Heritage folk either reduce their family size or avoid having White children altogether.
            Our inherent empathy — and the knowledge of imminent danger — simply stops us from bringing good decent productive high-IQ children into a diseased low-IQ society.
            .
            Perhaps that is a different type of genocide, but it is a holocaust none the less.
            .
            The keezer-xionists motto:
            * “By DECEPTION, We Make Wars”

      2. Anon 2:35,
        .
        Communism is the process.
        BOLSHEVIKS goal is a few RulingParasites lording over millions of brown toiling in the fields.
        .
        Based solely on decades of evidence, getting the brown to do anything productive?
        Heck, a turn-signal warning requires a dozen LawEnforcementOfficials and eighteen felonies.
        .
        I am going to guess keezer-xionists are in deep lust with their perfect utopia… while investing pretty much zero deliberation to the lead-up.

        1. > BOLSHEVIKS goal is a few RulingParasites lording over millions of brown toiling in the fields.

          The American Confederacy was BOLSHEVIK?

          Gosh, these minorities’ Jedi mind tricks sure are powerful, both the high and low average-achievement groups, such that a majority White society just minding its own business is powerless before them, and votes whatever way it is told to.

      1. John,
        .
        From my post earlier today on Tactical Hermit:
        “Chud films documentaries about brown nincompoops.
        If the brown dislike documentaries about their nincompoopery, they can shut off the television set and go outside to play basketball and etmerda.
        .
        I saw a quote:
        * “Attempted murder against a film-maker is acceptable, but defense against that murderer is a crime?””

        1. Yes. The First Amendment protects everyone but people who make a racism. The Second Amendment makes sure you go to jail if you defend yourself from a black man.

          1. Perffessor,
            .
            In United States v. Miller (307 U.S. 174), the 1939 Supreme Court ruled the defendants’ disappearance* automatically threw the case into permanent limbo.
            That pretty much invalidates the 1934 Firearms Tax Act and all subsequent ‘laws’ concerning firearms, firearm accessories, and related equipment and supplies such as ammunition.
            .
            In Tennessee v. Chud, if the brown assailant suddenly ‘disappears’, I think the defense could use the former landmark decision to discredit the entire government position.
            .
            .
            footnotes:
            * Who benefits from the disappearance of the defendants Miller et al?
            Who has motive and opportunity?

          2. Miller was the worst possible law! Yup, who benefited? And many forget that there was an “assassination attempt” on FDR that caused these laws to be passed.

  7. If the uniparty didn’t want it, it wouldn’t be happening

  8. I think a lot of this is the olde reversal. There where some of minorities that got railroaded and folks knew it and that hangs heavy with these DAs, Judges etc. Gotta hold someone more accountable now than the rule of law or practice lawfare to some how make things “right”

    1. Considering how blacks behave today, I am inclined to believe that the vast majority of those stories of their mistreatment are fables.

    2. Then those DAs, judges, etc are assholes, and fools, and plain wrong. That’s assuming they’re acting in “good faith” by trying to redress past (claimed) wrongs done unto people long dead by treating unjustly living persons who had nothing to do with the claimed past injustice. If they’re not acting in good (albeit horribly misguided) faith them they’re hypocrites to boot.

      Western culture, and jurisprudence, is primarily centered on the individual. This has been a great strength [1] but it’s been perverted and weaponized against us, to the point where we [2] are atomized persons without folk, without culture, without roots, and hence easy prey for psychopathic, paranoid ethnosupremacists who hate us “for no reason at all” (TM) [3].

      We men of the West do not punish families or clans or kindreds for the misbehavior of particular individuals in the group. That’s not how our culture or legal system works (these days). Yet that’s exactly what the worst people among us demand. Collective guilt and punishment for Whites, and the opposite for everyone else, especially themselves.

      There is not a single living German who industrially murdered Jews. There is not a single living White American who whipped Kunta Kinte and told him his name was Toby. But Germans must collectively be punished for the Holocaust, and White Americans for antebellum slavery, forever. On the other hand, when it comes to outright criminals like Decarlos Dejuan Brown (who murdered Iryna Zarutska) it’s all NAXALT and IKAGO and but
      muh racism. When it’s Epstein or Weinstein (or not illegal but certainly assholish and wicked, like Paul Singer or Larry Fink) then first with the antisemitism accusations, then the “but he wasn’t observant” or “but he didn’t follow the dietary laws so he doesn’t count.” In other words, they demand to be treated as individuals when one of theirs does something very very wrong, but it’s collective punishment for all Whites, including the overwhelming majority who have done Nothing wrong.

      [1] the individual vs collective guilt thing helped the West become the most advanced and objectively best society overall. But it works only when those in power at least pretend to follow those rules. Our current ruling class doesn’t even pretend to do so. (As to the argument of “but they’re only 2%, they don’t have the votes! Whoever says that is either hopelessly naive and should not be allowed out by themselves, or they’re gaslighting liars.) So unfortunately we need to learn to tribe up. Again. I think it’s a step backwards, but it’s necessary for survival.
      [2] some of you know I’m Han, not White. But I’m all in on the West. I don’t fit in to any East Asian culture, and I have nowhere else I’d rather go, or could go. So that’s why I say “We”. (Nerd stuff incoming: To paraphrase Elendil after the foundering of Numenor: Out of the Great Sea to America I [okay, my parents] am come. Here I will abide, and my heirs, unto the ending of the world.)
      [3] their hatred is intense, but it’s not only hatred. It’s very complicated.

      1. They’re still only 2% and they still don’t have the votes. The Western Whites did this collective guilt and punishment for behavior no one alive did to themselves, then claimed they are victims of the 2%.

        I think the fallacy here is “reification”, where the government is said to act and operate without needing the inputs of taxes, obedience by the ruled, etc. So if a 2%-er wants a thing then they can make their thing come true in reality using the technological mechanism of magic.

  9. Considering he was out on bail for at least one, maybe two other crimes, and was at the courthouse that day because he was being sued by a debt collector, he is lucky to have bail/bond at all. Never seen any bail/bond conditions that did not prohibit the carrying of weapons. Never seen a courthouse that allowed weapons to be brought into it.

Comments are closed.